What’s the issue?
A wave of rate cases we discussed a year ago has begun to be filed.
Why does it matter?
These rate cases will often dictate the revenue expectations for the pipelines involved for a number of years and are important for both equity owners and shippers to understand when assessing the risks of either investing in or shipping on the pipeline in question.
What’s our view?
The most recent case that was filed was by Florida Gas Transmission, a joint venture of Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan. While most rate cases eventually settle, Energy Transfer has taken a very aggressive approach with regard to a case it has pending for its Panhandle Eastern pipeline. Energy Transfer appears to be managing this case as well. Therefore, it may not settle, but if it does, we expect that the final rate agreed to by the shippers may be up to 18% less than that proposed by Florida Gas Transmission. This could make the difference between the rate increasing or decreasing.
Try a free month of Insights to read the full article.
Browse recent blogs about a similar topic.
Traditional electric generation projects using nuclear, coal or natural gas were very large projects that could be tracked individually as they progressed. By contrast, the solar industry builds a large number of much smaller nameplate capacity projects, which makes monitoring them individually both more difficult but also less relevant.
Many of Biden’s executive orders have received coverage in the press and appear to be generally hostile to the energy industry, but others are reported to be very supportive of renewables. While they may reveal a president’s views, executive orders often do not actually accomplish much and are often misconstrued as to their real-world impact.
DAPL shippers, and by extension the market in general, face tremendous uncertainty over the ability to move crude while the EIS is being prepared.